Sampling and Response Biases: 7 to avoid in research surveys

In the world of research methodologies, surveys stand as stalwart vessels, navigating the currents of data collection. However, just as a skilled captain must avoid hidden rocks and treacherous waters, researchers must steer clear of sampling and response biases that can skew survey results. In this post we briefly summarise the seven types of sampling and responses biases to avoid in research surveys.

1. Selection Bias: This occurs when certain groups within the population have a higher chance of being selected for the survey. For instance, if a survey about internet usage only targets urban areas, rural perspectives might be overlooked, leading to an incomplete picture.
2. Non-Response Bias: When survey respondents differ significantly from non-respondents, it introduces a non-response bias. This could happen if certain demographics are less likely to participate, skewing the results towards those who do respond.
3. Volunteer Bias: Similar to non-response bias, volunteer bias arises when survey participants self-select to take part. This can lead to the overrepresentation of individuals with strong opinions or particular interests, distorting the overall findings.
4. Sampling Bias: Incorrectly defining the population or using a non-random sampling method can result in sampling bias. For instance, if a survey on food preferences only targets health-conscious individuals, the results won’t accurately represent the broader population.

• 5. Response Bias: This bias stems from how questions are framed or phrased, leading respondents to answer in a certain way. For example, asking leading questions like “Don’t you agree that…” can subtly influence responses.
• 6. Social Desirability Bias: Respondents may alter their answers to align with societal norms or expectations, rather than expressing their true beliefs or behaviors. This bias can skew results, especially in sensitive topics like health or politics.
• 7. Confirmation Bias: Researchers or respondents may have preconceived notions or preferences that influence the survey process. This can lead to selective interpretation of data or emphasizing information that supports existing beliefs, rather than objectively analyzing the findings.

Avoiding these biases requires careful planning and execution of surveys. Employing random sampling techniques, ensuring diverse participation, using neutral language in questions, and maintaining anonymity can help mitigate these biases. Additionally, conducting pilot surveys and seeking feedback from colleagues can refine survey instruments and reduce biases.

As researchers, our quest for accurate data guides us through the intricate waters of survey design and analysis. By understanding and avoiding these seven sampling and response biases, we are more likely to be on course towards robust and reliable research outcomes.

Recommended reading

Williams, M., Wiggins, R., Vogt, W. P., & Vogt, P. R. (2022). Beginning quantitative research. Sage. (Click to view on Amazon #Ad)

This concise text provides a clear and digestible introduction to completing quantitative research. Taking you step-by-step through the process of completing your quantitative research project, it offers guidance on:

·       Formulating your research question

·       Completing literature reviews and meta-analysis

·       Formulating a research design and specifying your target population and data source

·       Choosing an appropriate method and analysing your findings

Part of The SAGE Quantitative Research Kit, this book will give you the know-how and confidence needed to succeed on your quantitative research journey.

Glenn Stevens

Glenn is an academic writing and research specialist with 15 years experience as a writing coach and PhD supervisor. Also a qualified English teacher, he previously had an extensive career in publishing. He is currently the editor of this website. Glenn lives in the UK.
Contact Glenn